4.6 Article

Rapid characterization and determination of isoflavones and triterpenoid saponins in Fu-Zhu-Jiang-Tang tablets using UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS and HPLC-UV

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 8, Issue 21, Pages 4211-4219

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ay00732e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nutritional Science Foundation of By-Health Co. [TY0141103]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for the Youth of Jiangsu Province [BK20140963]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a rapid ultra-high performance liquid chromatograph coupled with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS) was used for qualitative analysis of chemical constituents in Fu-Zhu- Jiang-Tang tablets, a new six-herb preparation for treating type II diabetes. Qualitative analysis was performed on a Kromasil C-18 column (4.6 mm x 150 mm, 5 mu m), using gradient elution with 0.1% formic acid-water and acetonitrile mobile phase. As a result, 39 compounds were identified or tentatively characterized, including 13 flavonoids, 12 fatty acids, 8 triterpenoid saponins, 2 phenols and 4 unknown compounds. Among them, 17 compounds were confirmed by comparing with standards. In addition, an HPLC-UV method was developed for quantitative determination of ten major compounds in the Fu-Zhu-Jiang-Tang tablet, including 3'-hydroxypuerarin, puerarin, 3'-methoxypuerarin, daidzin, rutin, astragalin, daidzein, ginsenoside Rg(1), astragaloside IV and 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg(3). The HPLC chromatograms were monitored at 254 nm and 210 nm. The method was well validated with respect to intra-day and inter-day precision and stability, with RSD values less than 1.64%, 1.19% and 1.77%, respectively. All the ten major compounds showed good linearity (r(2) > 0.9971), and their average recoveries varied between 97.6% and 104.3%. The HPLC-UV method was successfully applied to ten batches of Fu-Zhu-Jiang-Tang tablets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available