4.6 Article

The serum level of a novel lipogenic protein Spot 14 was reduced in metabolic syndrome

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212341

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [105-2314-B-002-173-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spot 14 (S14) protein is primarily expressed in adipogenic tissues. Compared to wild type, S14 knockout mice had better resistance to diet-induced obesity and glucose tolerance. However, the association between serum S14 level and metabolic variables in humans has never been investigated. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the associations between serum S14 concentrations with components of metabolic syndrome (MetS). A total of 327 subjects were recruited in this cross-sectional study and categorized by presence of MetS. The mean serum levels of S14 were significantly lower in subjects with MetS than those without (87.1 +/- 26.3 mu g/L vs. 107.3 +/- 40.2 mu g/L, p<0.001). In addition, the subjects with central obesity, low high density lipoprotein-C (HDL-C) or hypertriglyceridemia also had significantly lower S14 levels in comparison to those without. Adjusted with age and sex, diagnosis of MetS (beta = -0.227, p<0.001), central obesity (beta = -0.176, p = 0.001), low HDL-C (beta = -0.149, p = 0.005), and high triglyceride (TG) (beta = -0.198, p<0.001) were negatively associated with log transformation of serum S14 levels (logS14). With 25% logS14 increased, the risk of MetS (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.51-0.82, p<0.001), central obesity (OR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.58-0.89, p = 0.002), low HDL-C (OR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.61-0.95, p = 0.015) or high TG (OR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.51-0.83, p = 0.001) was reduced with a dose response trend. Our analysis revealed that patients with MetS had lower serum S14 levels than those without. Negative associations existed between MetS, central obesity, high TG, low HDL-C and logS14.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available