4.8 Article

Regeneration of Solanum tuberosum Plants from Protoplasts Induces Widespread Genome Instability

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 1, Pages 78-86

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00906

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) (Plant Genome IOS) [1444612]
  2. H.M. Clause, Inc.
  3. Innovative Genomics Institute, UC Berkeley
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1444612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nontransgenic genome editing in regenerable protoplasts, plant cells free of their cell wall, could revolutionize crop improvement because it reduces regulatory and technical complexity. However, plant tissue culture is known to engender frequent unwanted variation, termed somaclonal variation. To evaluate the contribution of large-scale genome instability to this phenomenon, we analyzed potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) regenerated from either protoplasts or stem explants for copy number changes by comparison of Illumina read depth. Whereas a control set of eight plants that had been propagated by cuttings displayed no changes, all 15 protoplast regenerants tested were affected by aneuploidy or structural chromosomal changes. Certain chromosomes displayed segmental deletions and duplications ranging from one to many. Resampling different leaves of the same plant found differences in three regenerants, indicating frequent persistence of instability. By comparison, 33 regenerants from stem explants used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation displayed less frequent but still considerable (18%) large-scale copy number changes. Repetition of certain instability patterns suggested greater susceptibility in specific genomic sites. These results indicate that tissue culture, depending on the protocol used, can induce genomic instability resulting in large-scale changes likely to compromise final plant phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available