4.7 Review

Ozone effects on plants in natural ecosystems

Journal

PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 12-37

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/plb.12971

Keywords

Case studies; conifers; ecological setting; genetics; hardwoods; ozone exposure

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropospheric ozone (O-3) is an important stressor in natural ecosystems, with well-documented impacts on soils, biota and ecological processes. The effects of O(3)on individual plants and processes scale up through the ecosystem through effects on carbon, nutrient and hydrologic dynamics. Ozone effects on individual species and their associated microflora and fauna cascade through the ecosystem to the landscape level. Systematic injury surveys demonstrate that foliar injury occurs on sensitive species throughout the globe. However, deleterious impacts on plant carbon, water and nutrient balance can also occur without visible injury. Because sensitivity to O(3)may follow coarse physiognomic plant classes (in general, herbaceous crops are more sensitive than deciduous woody plants, grasses and conifers), the task still remains to use stomatal O(3)uptake to assess class and species' sensitivity. Investigations of the radial growth of mature trees, in combination with data from many controlled studies with seedlings, suggest that ambient O(3)reduces growth of mature trees in some locations. Models based on tree physiology and forest stand dynamics suggest that modest effects of O(3)on growth may accumulate over time, other stresses (prolonged drought, excess nitrogen deposition) may exacerbate the direct effects of O(3)on tree growth, and competitive interactions among species may be altered. Ozone exposure over decades may be altering the species composition of forests currently, and as fossil fuel combustion products generate more O(3)than deteriorates in the atmosphere, into the future as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available