4.7 Article

Tree size and leaf traits determine the fertility island effect in Prosopis pallida dryland forest in Northern Peru

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 437, Issue 1-2, Pages 117-135

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-03965-7

Keywords

Algarrobo; Leaf traits; LMA; Nutrient; Nitrogen; Tree size; Phosphorous

Funding

  1. Programa Nacional de Innovacion para la Competitividad y Productividad INNOVATE PERU [146-FINCyT-IB-2013]
  2. Spanish MEC project DIVERBOS [CGL2011-30285-C02-02]
  3. Spanish MEC project ECO-MEDIT [CGL2014-53236-R]
  4. European FEDER funds
  5. Spanish MEC project QUERCUSAT [CLG2013-40790-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo assess the fertility island effect of Prosopis pallida in the North Peruvian dry forests and analyze if it is influenced by tree size and structural and/or chemical leaf traits.MethodsWe measured the soil nutrient concentrations under and outside the tree canopy in five populations that differ in mean annual temperature and annual rainfall in North Peru. We also measured tree size (height, stem diameter, and crown area), leaf structure (leaf mass per area (LMA) and leaf dry matter content), and leaf nutrient concentrations (C, N, P, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn).ResultsThe concentration of most soil nutrients was higher under the P. pallida canopy. Tree size affected positively the soil C, N, and P concentrations, while leaf structural traits such as LMA were negatively related to the soil C, N, and P concentrations. The relationships between the nutrient concentrations in the leaf and soil were only significant for P and Mn. The tree size effect was greater in those populations where the temperature was lower, suggesting the fertility island effect can be increased or weakened by climatic factors.ConclusionsP. pallida have a significant though limited fertility island effect regulated by plant traits and influenced by climatic factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available