4.7 Article

Is Tollmien-Schlichting wave necessary for transition of zero pressure gradient boundary layer flow?

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5089294

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comprehensive understanding of the routes of instability and transition for many flows is not complete yet. For a zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer, linear spatial theory predicted Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) waves, which have been experimentally verified by vortically exciting the flow by a monochromatic source. This is the well-known frequency response of dynamical system theory. Natural transition in real flows occurs due to polychromatic excitation, and to simulate such transition, the ZPG boundary layer has been excited via an impulse response in some of our recent direct numerical simulations. Such impulse responses cause transition even when TS waves are not excited. In the present exercise, we show the theoretical basis of natural transition by spatiotemporal stability analysis, as used in the work of Sengupta et al. [Spatiotemporal growing wave fronts in spatially stable boundary layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(22), 224504 (2006)], by invoking finite start-up of the frequency response to wall excitation. There appear to be different instability mechanisms active for the frequency and the impulse responses to localized wall excitation. Here, we show that in both the frequency and impulse responses, the spatiotemporal wave front (STWF) is the common element. Additionally, we also consider cases, where following different start-ups, the wall excitation remains constant, which also show the presence of the STWF. The presented results for the ZPG boundary layer show that the TS wave is not necessary for transition to turbulence and help us to re-evaluate our understanding of the transition mechanism for this canonical flow. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available