4.7 Article

Time resolved measurements of droplet preferential concentration in homogeneous isotropic turbulence without mean flow

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5063673

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/E029515/]
  2. European Union COST Action [MP0806]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [1187020923]
  4. EPSRC [EP/E029515/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental investigation of the time-dependent spatial distribution of droplet concentration in a box of stationary homogeneous and isotropic turbulence without mean flow was performed for polydispersed droplet clouds with a wide range of mean droplet diameters and droplet size distributions, characterized by a representative Stokes number, based on the droplet arithmetic diameter and the Kolmogorov time scale of the flow, varying between 0.2 and 6, and for turbulent Reynolds numbers of 98, 127, 147, and 235. A novel morphological tracking scheme was used to provide temporal tracking of droplet clusters according to cluster morphological features. The tracking scheme was based on Voronoi space tessellation, multivariate kernel density estimation, and mean shift feature space tracking. The developed tracking scheme was used to establish the relationship between the morphological features of droplet clusters, i.e., number of clusters per unit area and cluster length scales, and the velocity of droplet clusters. The time scale of the droplet clusters increased with both the turbulent Reynolds number and the Stokes number, but its dependence was stronger on the turbulence level. In addition, the effect of filling factors of turbulent flows by turbulent structures on droplet clustering was discussed, which led to suggestions of potential flow control methods to mitigate droplet preferential concentration. (c) 2019 Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available