4.6 Article

Event-by-event non-rigid data-driven PET respiratory motion correction methods: comparison of principal component analysis and centroid of distribution

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0bc9

Keywords

respiratory motion; data-driven; non-rigid event-by-event motion correction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Respiratory motion is a major cause of degradation of PET image quality. Respiratory gating and motion correction can be performed to reduce the effects of respiratory motion; these methods require motion information, typically obtained from external tracking systems. Various groups have studied data-driven (DD) motion estimation methods. Recently, a DD respiratory motion estimation method was established by calculating the centroid of distribution (COD) of listmode events, which was then used with event-by-event respiratory motion correction (EBE-MC) and showed results comparable to those with an external motion tracking device. The EBE-MC method only corrected for rigid motion, so that non-rigid components still contributed to motion-induced blurring. A non-rigid respiratory motion correction (NRMC) was later developed to overcome this problem, but was only evaluated using signals from an external monitor. Thus, it is desirable to further develop DD motion estimation to achieve the best respiratory motion correction results. We evaluated two DD respiratory motion detection methods, COD and principal component analysis (PCA), by comparing the extracted motion trace to that acquired by the Anzai system in dynamic studies with two tracers. PCA was chosen as a preliminary study indicated that it produced stable results than other DD methods. We then developed and performed DD-EBE-NRMC using either COD-or PCA-derived respiratory motion information. DD correction results were compared with Anzai-based results. For all tested studies, both COD and PCA showed a good-to-excellent match with Anzai signals, with PCA showing a higher correlation with Anzai signals. The DD-EBE-NRMC results showed that both COD and PCA provide comparable image quality improvement to the Anzai-based correction. Although COD showed a lower correlation with Anzai than PCA, COD-based NRMC results are comparable to those of PCA, both of which showed great reduction in motion-induced blurring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available