4.8 Article

Pressure Distribution and Shear Forces inside the Proton

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.072003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ACI-1548562, TG-PHY170018]
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy
  3. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant [1841699]
  5. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  6. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development
  7. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation
  8. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0010495, DE-SC0011090]
  9. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics
  10. SciDAC4 Award [DE-SC0018121]
  11. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0010495] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distributions of pressure and shear forces inside the proton are investigated using lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) calculations of the energy momentum tensor, allowing the first model independent determination of these fundamental aspects of proton structure. This is achieved by combining recent LQCD results for the gluon contributions to the energy momentum tensor with earlier calculations of the quark contributions. The utility of LQCD calculations in exploring, and supplementing, the assumptions in a recent extraction of the pressure distribution in the proton from deeply virtual Compton scattering is also discussed. Based on this study, the target kinematics for experiments aiming to determine the pressure and shear distributions with greater precision at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility and a future electron ion collider are investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available