4.8 Article

Constraining the p-Mode-g-Mode Tidal Instability with GW170817

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.061104

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  3. Department of Science and Technology, India
  4. ScienceAMP
  5. Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  6. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  7. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion
  8. Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d'Innovacio, Recerca i Turisme
  9. Conselleria d'Educacio i Universitat del Govern de les Illes Balears
  10. Conselleria d'Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport de la Generalitat Valenciana
  11. National Science Centre of Poland
  12. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  13. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  14. Russian Science Foundation
  15. European Commission
  16. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  17. Royal Society
  18. Scottish Funding Council
  19. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  20. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  21. Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  22. Paris Ile-de-France Region
  23. National Research, Development and Innovation Office Hungary (NKFI)
  24. National Research Foundation of Korea
  25. Industry Canada
  26. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  27. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada
  28. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  29. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations, and Communications
  30. International Center for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTP-SAIFR)
  31. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  32. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  33. Leverhulme Trust
  34. Research Corporation
  35. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  36. Kavli Foundation
  37. NASA [NNX14AB40G]
  38. STFC [ST/S000305/1, 2142081, ST/N005422/1, ST/K000845/1, ST/N005430/1, 1654298, 1653089, ST/I006269/1, ST/N000633/1, 1802888, ST/K005014/1, ST/N005406/2, ST/R00045X/1, ST/N005406/1, ST/K005014/2, ST/N000668/1, 1945971, 1802894, ST/S000453/1, ST/H002006/1, ST/M005844/1, ST/J00166X/1, ST/N000072/1, ST/P000258/1, Gravitational Waves, PPA/G/S/2002/00652, ST/N00003X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze the impact of a proposed tidal instability coupling p modes and g modes within neutron stars on GW170817. This nonresonant instability transfers energy from the orbit of the binary to internal modes of the stars, accelerating the gravitational-wave driven inspiral. We model the impact of this instability on the phasing of the gravitational wave signal using three parameters per star: an overall amplitude, a saturation frequency, and a spectral index. Incorporating these additional parameters, we compute the Bayes factor (ln B-!pg(pg)) comparing our p-g model to a standard one. We find that the observed signal is consistent with waveform models that neglect p-g effects, with ln B-!pg(pg) = 0.03(-0.58)(+0.70) (maximum a posteriori and 90% credible region). By injecting simulated signals that do not include p-g effects and recovering them with the p-g model, we show that there is a similar or equal to 50% probability of obtaining similar ln B-!pg(pg) even when p-g effects are absent. We find that the p-g amplitude for 1.4 M-circle dot neutron stars is constrained to less than a few tenths of the theoretical maximum, with maxima a posteriori near one-tenth this maximum and p-g saturation frequency similar to 70 Hz. This suggests that there are less than a few hundred excited modes, assuming they all saturate by wave breaking. For comparison, theoretical upper bounds suggest less than or similar to 10(3) modes saturate by wave breaking. Thus, the measured constraints only rule out extreme values of the p-g parameters. They also imply that the instability dissipates less than or similar to 10(51) erg over the entire inspiral, i.e., less than a few percent of the energy radiated as gravitational waves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available