4.8 Article

Orthogonality Catastrophe in Dissipative Quantum Many-Body Systems

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.040604

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Institutional Strategy of the University of Cologne within the German Excellence Initiative [ZUK 81, SFB1238]
  2. European Research Council via ERC Grant [647434]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt foundation
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [745608]
  5. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY-1748958]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [647434] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analog of the phenomenon of orthogonality catastrophe in quantum many-body systems subject to a local dissipative impurity. We show that the fidelity F(t), giving a measure for distance of the time-evolved state from the initial one, displays a universal scaling form F(t) proportional to t(theta) e(-gamma t), when the system supports long-range correlations, in a fashion reminiscent of traditional instances of orthogonality catastrophe in condensed matter. An exponential falloff at rate gamma signals the onset of environmental decoherence, which is critically slowed down by the additional algebraic contribution to the fidelity. This picture is derived within a second-order cumulant expansion suited for Liouvillian dynamics, and substantiated for the one-dimensional transverse field quantum Ising model subject to a local dephasing jump operator, as well as for XY and XX quantum spin chains, and for the two-dimensional Bose gas deep in the superfluid phase with local particle heating. Our results hint that local sources of dissipation can be used to inspect real-time correlations and to induce a delay of decoherence in open quantum many-body systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available