4.4 Article

The value of high-dose radiotherapy in intracranial ependymoma

Journal

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27697

Keywords

adjuvant radiotherapy; dose-response; ependymoma; overall survival; pediatric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background We sought to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy dose on overall survival (OS) after surgical resection for localized intracranial ependymoma. Procedure The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients of all ages with intracranial WHO grade II to III ependymoma treated with surgery and 4500 to 7000 cGy of adjuvant radiotherapy. Pearson chi(2) test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess clinicodemographic factors and patterns of care. After propensity-score matching, OS was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results Of the 1153 patients meeting criteria, 529 (46%) received <= 5400 cGy and 624 (54%) received > 5400 cGy. At a median follow-up of 54.5 months, an OS benefit was observed for > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged 2-18 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.99, P = 0.047). No OS difference was found between <= 5400 cGy and > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged < 2 years (P = 0.819) or in adults (P = 0.180). Increasing age, WHO grade III, subtotal resection, and receipt of chemotherapy portended worse OS. Age 2 to 18 years, WHO III grade, supratentorial location, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receiving > 5400 cGy. Conclusion Adjuvant radiotherapy dose > 5400 cGy was associated with improved OS for children aged 2-18 years with WHO grade II-III intracranial ependymoma. No OS benefit was found with > 5400 cGy in adults or children less than two years of age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available