4.4 Article

Characterization of Gasoline by Raman Spectroscopy with Chemometric Analysis

Journal

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 1126-1138

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2016.1210616

Keywords

Chemometrics; gasoline adulteration; principal component analysis; Raman spectroscopy; variable selection

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [472948/2013-0]
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2010/16520-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid Raman spectroscopy protocol is reported to classify gasoline according to its distributor and to identify and quantify common adulterants. Gasoline from three distributors was collected from 19 stations in SAo Paulo, Brazil. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed specific clusters for each distributor, and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) correctly identified the origin of the samples. To evaluate the technique for the identification and quantification of the adulterants, authentic samples from each distributor were fortified at levels from 2.5 up to 25.0% (v/v) using ethanol, methanol, toluene, and turpentine to obtain 120 altered samples. PCA showed clear separation among the samples with the adulterants and PLS-DA precisely identified the adulterants (478 in 480 predictions by cross-validation), irrespective of the distributor and the concentration. One classification model was used to characterize all distributors. To quantify the adulterants, 36 multivariate calibration models were constructed using partial least squares (PLS), interval PLS, and PLS genetic algorithm for each distributor and for each adulterant. Cross-validation errors of less than 5.0% were obtained for all adulterants regardless of the distributor. Raman spectroscopy and multivariate analysis were shown to be powerful for rapid and inexpensive for the characterization of gasoline origin and the identification and quantification of common adulterants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available