4.6 Article

Health resource use and costs of symptomatic knee and/or hip osteoarthritis

Journal

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 1011-1017

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.005

Keywords

Osteoarthritis; Knee; Hip; Costs; Health resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data on the economic consequences of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are scarce. We aimed to estimate the annual direct and indirect costs for patients followed for hip and/or knee OA in the Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Long term Assessment (KHOALA) cohort. Methods: The KHOALA cohort, set up from 2007 to 2009, is a French multicenter study of 878 individuals with symptomatic knee/hip OA who were 40-75 years old. Resources used were collected annually for 5 years. Costs were assigned by using official sources and expressed in 2018 euros per patient. Results: The mean annual total costs per patient over the 5-year study period were 2,180 +/- 5,305(sic). The mean annual direct medical costs per patient were 2,120 +/- 5,275(sic) and mean annual indirect costs per patient 180 +/- 1,735(sic) for people of working age. Costs increased slightly over the study period. Drugs were the largest cost share, representing over 50% of all direct costs. However, the proportion attributable to OA drugs accounted for only 10.5% of drug costs. The second cost share was hospitalizations; hip and knee prosthetic surgery accounted for 27% of surgery hospitalization costs. Health professional visits were the third cost share, accounting for 3% of direct medical costs. The median costs induced could be as high as 2 billion (sic)/year (IQR 0.7-4.3) in France. Conclusion: Hip and knee OA costs were substantial and increased over the study period in France. However, the costs attributable to OA represented only a small fraction of overall costs. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available