4.6 Article

Aberration-resistible topological charge determination of annular-shaped optical vortex beams using Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 7803-7821

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.007803

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61525106, 61427807, U180920013]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0104000]
  3. Shenzhen Innovation Funding [JCYJ20170818164343304, JCYJ20170816172431715]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining topological charge (TC) of optical vortex (OV) beams is important for many applications, such as optical measurement and information transmission through long-distance propagation. In this application, the OV beams usually have an annular intensity profile at the receiving end and are inevitably distorted by aberrations during propagation. In this paper, we propose a simple, direct, and aberration-resistible method to determine the TC value of this annular-shaped OV beam with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SH-WFS). Our approach involves finding a closed-path along the annular intensity distribution ridge, and then determining the TC value by a discrete circulation calculation with only the phase-slope vectors along the closed-path. Verification experiments were performed using a phase-only spatial light modulator to generate OV beams and aberrations, while SH-WFS to measure the intensity profile and phase-slopes. The results show that our method can determine the TC value of up to +/- 20. The robustness against wavefront aberration and simulated atmospheric turbulence was evaluated. We also verified the proposed closed-path's superiority to other circular closed-paths for TC determination. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available