Adding a Wider Range and Hope for the Best, and Prepare for the Worst Statement: Preferences of Patients with Cancer for Prognostic Communication

Introduction Although various phrases to communicate prognoses based on a certain concept have been proposed, no study has systematically investigated preferences of patients with cancer for actual phrases. We investigated whether phrases with a wider range and additional hope for the best, and prepare for the worst (hope/prepare) statement would be more preferable and explored variables associated with patients' preferences. Materials and Methods In a cross-sectional survey, 412 outpatients with cancer self-assessed their preferences for 13 phrases conveying prognostic information (e.g., phrases with or without median, typical range, and/or best/worst cases, and those with or without a hope/prepare statement) on a 6-point scale (1 = not at all preferable; 6 = very preferable). We evaluated demographic data and the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations and conducted multivariate regression analysis. Results Regarding phrases with various ranges, the one including the median, typical range, and best/worst cases was more preferable (mean +/- SD, 3.8 +/- 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-3.9) than the one with the median and typical range (3.4 +/- 1.2; 3.3-3.6) or the one with only the median (3.2 +/- 1.3; 3.1-3.3). Concerning the hope/prepare statement, the phrase including the median, typical range, uncertainty, and hope/prepare statement was more preferable (3.8 +/- 1.4; 3.7-3.9) than the one without the statement (3.5 +/- 1.2; 3.4-3.6). In multivariate analyses, task-oriented coping was significantly correlated with preferences for phrases with explicit information. Conclusion Overall, phrases with a wider range and the hope/prepare statement were preferable to those without them. When patients with cancer ask about prognoses, especially those with task-oriented coping, clinicians may provide explicit information with a wider range and the hope/prepare statement. Implications for Practice Discussing prognoses with patients with advanced cancer is among the most important conversations for clinicians. In this cross-sectional survey to systematically investigate preferences of 412 patients with cancer for phrases conveying prognostic information, phrases with the median, typical range, and best/worst cases and those with the hope for the best and prepare for the worst (hope/prepare) statement were the most preferred. When patients with cancer ask about prognoses, clinicians may provide explicit information with a wider range and include the hope/prepare statement.