4.8 Article

Codon stabilization coefficient as a metric to gain insights into mRNA stability and codon bias and their relationships with translation

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 2216-2228

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz033

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The codon stabilization coefficient (CSC) is derived from the correlation between each codon frequency in transcripts and mRNA half-life experimental data. In this work, we used this metric as a reference to compare previously published Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA half-life datasets and investigate how codon composition related to protein levels. We generated CSCs derived from nine studies. Four datasets produced similar CSCs, which also correlated with other independent parameters that reflected codon optimality, such as the tRNA abundance and ribosome residence time. By calculating the average CSC for each gene, we found that most mRNAs tended to have more non-optimal codons. Conversely, a high proportion of optimal codons was found for genes coding highly abundant proteins, including proteins that were only transiently overexpressed in response to stress conditions. We also used CSCs to identify and locate mRNA regions enriched in non-optimal codons. We found that these stretches were usually located close to the initiation codon and were sufficient to slow ribosome movement. However, in contrast to observations from reporter systems, we found no position-dependent effect on the mRNA half-life. These analyses underscore the value of CSCs in studies of mRNA stability and codon bias and their relationships with protein expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available