4.3 Article

TTT in CFT: Trace identities and the conformal anomaly effective action

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
Volume 942, Issue -, Pages 303-328

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.03.019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust Visiting Professorship at the STAG Research Centre, University of Southampton
  2. Leverhulme Trust Visiting Professorship at Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton
  3. INFN, iniziativa specifica HEP-QFT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress-energy correlation functions in a general Conformal Field Theory (CFT) in four dimensions are described in a fully covariant approach, as metric variations of the quantum effective action in an arbitrary curved space background field. All Conservation, Trace and Conformal Ward Identities (CWIs), including contact terms, are completely fixed in this covariant approach. The Trace and CWIs are anomalous. Their anomalous contributions may be computed unambiguously by metric variation of the exact 1PI quantum effective action determined by the conformal anomaly of < T-mu nu > in d = 4 curved space. This action implies the existence of massless propagator poles in three and higher point correlators of T-mu nu. The metric variations of the anomaly effective action in its local form in terms of a scalar confonnalon field are carried out explicitly for the case of the correlator of three CFT stress-energy tensors, and the result is shown to coincide with the algebraic reconstruction of < TTT > from its transverse, tracefree parts, determined independently by the solution of the CWIs in d dimensional flat space in the momentum representation. This demonstrates that the specific analytic structure and massless poles predicted by the general curved space anomaly effective action are in fact a necessary feature of the exact solution of the anomalous CWIs in any d = 4 CFT. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available