4.6 Article

Pollination effectiveness in a generalist plant: adding the genetic component

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 223, Issue 1, Pages 354-365

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15743

Keywords

effectiveness landscape; Erysimum mediohispanicum; generalist pollination system; multiple paternity; pollination effectiveness

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [CGL2009-07015]
  2. MINECO [BES-2010-030067]
  3. Junta de Andalucia [P11-RNM-7676]
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades [CGL2017-86626-C2-P]
  5. FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pollination effectiveness of a flower visitor has traditionally been measured as the product of a quantity component that depends on the frequency of interaction and a quality component that measures the per-visit effects on plant reproduction. We propose that this could be complemented with a genetic component informing about each pollinator's contribution to the genetic diversity and composition of the plant progeny. We measured the quantity and quality components of effectiveness of most pollinator functional groups of the generalist herb Erysimum mediohispanicum. We used 10 microsatellite markers to calculate the genetic component as the diversity of sires among siblings and included it into the calculation of the pollination effectiveness. Functional groups varied in the quantity and quality components, which were shown to be decoupled. Functional groups also differed in the genetic component. This component changed the estimates of pollination effectiveness, increasing the differences between some functional groups and modifying the pollination effectiveness landscape. We demonstrate that including the genetic component in the calculation of the pollination effectiveness may allow a more complete quantification of the contribution of each pollinator to the reproductive success of a plant, providing information on its mating patterns and long-term fitness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available