4.5 Article

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of Neural Responses to Visual and Auditory Food Stimuli Pre and Post Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG)

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 409, Issue -, Pages 290-298

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.061

Keywords

bariatric surgery; imaging; functional connectivity; dlPFC; fusiform; parahippocampal gyrus

Categories

Funding

  1. [R01DK080153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Of current obesity treatments, bariatric surgery induces the most weight loss. Given the marked increase in the number of bariatric surgeries performed, elucidating the mechanisms of action is a key research goal. We compared whole brain activation in response to high-energy dense (HED) vs. low-energy dense (LED) visual and auditory food cues before and approximately 4 months after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) (n = 16) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) (n = 9). We included two control groups: a low-calorie diet weight loss group (WL) (n = 14) and a non-treatment group (NT) (n = 16). Relative to the control groups, the surgery groups showed increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and decreased parahippocampal/fusiform gyrus (PHG/fusiform) activation in response to HED vs. LED, suggesting greater cognitive dietary inhibition and decreased rewarding effects and attention related to HED foods. dIPFC activation was significantly more increased in RYGB vs. SG. We also found that postprandial increases in GLP-1 concentrations (pre to postsurgery) correlated with postsurgical decreases in RYGB brain activity in the inferior temporal gyrus and the right middle occipital gyrus in addition to increases in the right medial prefrontal gyrus/paracingulate for HED > LED stimuli, suggesting involvement of these attention and inhibitory regions in satiety signaling postsurgery. (C) 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available