4.2 Article

Experience with tocilizumab in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Journal

NEUROLOGIA
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 178-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2018.12.013

Keywords

Neuromyelitis optica; Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders; Tocilizumab; Treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in patients with NMOSD who had previously failed immunosuppressant treatment, and the results showed that tocilizumab was safe and effective in clinical practice.
Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are immune-mediated inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system involving astrocytes, B lymphocytes, anti-aquaporin 4, and such inflammatory mediators as interleukin-6. Several immunosuppressants are used in their treatment. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, may be a Method: We performed an observational, retrospective study analysing parameters of effectiveness (annualised relapse rate, disability, and radiological progression) and safety of tocilizumab in patients with NMOSD in whom previous immunosuppressant treatment had failed. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in clinical practice in Results: Five patients with NMOSD were analysed. Sixty percent of patients were women; mean age at diagnosis was 50 +/- 5.3 years and mean progression time was 4.5 +/- 3.6 years. Previously administered immunosuppressants were rituximab (in all 5), cyclophosphamide (2), and azathioprine (1). Mean time of exposure to tocilizumab was 2.3 +/- 1 years. Mean annualised relapse rate was 1.8 +/- 1.3 in the year prior to the introduction of tocilizumab and 0.2 +/- 0.4 the year Conclusions: In our experience, tocilizumab is safe and effective in patients with NMOSD access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available