4.8 Article

Interrogating Surface Functional Group Heterogeneity of Activated Thermoplastics Using Super-Resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 88, Issue 7, Pages 3686-3696

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04472

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21HG006278, P41EB020594]
  2. National Science Foundation [1507577]
  3. Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology [1.130090.01]
  4. Roche
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. ACS Division of Analytical Chemistry
  7. Society for Analytical Chemists of Pittsburgh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a novel approach for characterizing surfaces utilizing super-resolution fluorescence microscopy with subdiffraction limit spatial resolution. Thermoplastic surfaces were activated by UV/O-3 or O-2 plasma treatment under various conditions to generate pendant surface-confined carboxylic acids (-COOH). These surface functional groups were then labeled with a photoswitchable dye and interrogated using single-molecule, localization-based, super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to elucidate the surface heterogeneity of these functional groups across the activated surface. Data indicated nonuniform distributions of these functional groups for both COC and PMMA thermoplastics with the degree of heterogeneity being dose dependent. In addition, COC demonstrated relative higher surface density of functional groups compared to PMMA for both UV/O-3 and O-2 plasma treatment. The spatial distribution of -COOH groups secured from super-resolution imaging were used to, simulate nonuniform patterns of electroosmotic flow in theilhoplastic nanochannels. Simulations were compared to single-particle tracking of fluorescent nanoparticles within thermoplastic nanoslits to demonstrate the effects of surface functional group heterogeneity on the electrokinetic transport process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available