4.7 Article

A practical guide to optimization in X10 expansion microscopy

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 832-863

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0117-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [754411]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 3600-B27]
  3. European Research Council
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB1286/Z03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expansion microscopy is a relatively new approach to super-resolution imaging that uses expandable hydrogels to isotropically increase the physical distance between fluorophores in biological samples such as cell cultures or tissue slices. The classic gel recipe results in an expansion factor of similar to 4x, with a resolution of 60-80 nm. We have recently developed X10 microscopy, which uses a gel that achieves an expansion factor of similar to 10x, with a resolution of similar to 25 nm. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol for X10 expansion microscopy. A typical experiment consists of seven sequential stages: (i) immunostaining, (ii) anchoring, (iii) polymerization, (iv) homogenization, (v) expansion, (vi) imaging, and (vii) validation. The protocol presented here includes recommendations for optimization, pitfalls and their solutions, and detailed guidelines that should increase reproducibility. Although our protocol focuses on X10 expansion microscopy, we detail which of these suggestions are also applicable to classic fourfold expansion microscopy. We exemplify our protocol using primary hippocampal neurons from rats, but our approach can be used with other primary cells or cultured cell lines of interest. This protocol will enable any researcher with basic experience in immunostainings and access to an epifluorescence microscope to perform super-resolution microscopy with X10. The procedure takes 3 d and requires similar to 5 h of actively handling the sample for labeling and expansion, and another similar to 3 h for imaging and analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available