4.7 Article

Cerebral organoids at the air-liquid interface generate diverse nerve tracts with functional output

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 669-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0350-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1201/9, MR/P008658/1, MC_UP_1201/2, MC_UP_1201/13]
  2. European Research Council ERC [STG 757710, STG 677029]
  3. Wellcome Trust [ISSF_ RRZC/115_RG89529]
  4. Newton Trust [RRZC/115_RG89305]
  5. MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  7. ERANET-NEURON Micronet consortium
  8. HFSP CDA
  9. MRC [MC_UP_1201/13, MC_PC_16036, MC_UP_1201/9, MC_UP_1201/2, MC_U105184326, MR/P008658/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neural organoids have the potential to improve our understanding of human brain development and neurological disorders. However, it remains to be seen whether these tissues can model circuit formation with functional neuronal output. Here we have adapted air-liquid interface culture to cerebral organoids, leading to improved neuronal survival and axon outgrowth. The resulting thick axon tracts display various morphologies, including long-range projection within and away from the organoid, growth-cone turning, and decussation. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals various cortical neuronal identities, and retrograde tracing demonstrates tract morphologies that match proper molecular identities. These cultures exhibit active neuronal networks, and subcortical projecting tracts can innervate mouse spinal cord explants and evoke contractions of adjacent muscle in a manner dependent on intact organoid-derived innervating tracts. Overall, these results reveal a remarkable self-organization of corticofugal and callosal tracts with a functional output, providing new opportunities to examine relevant aspects of human CNS development and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available