4.8 Article

Negligible cycling of terrestrial carbon in many lakes of the arid circumpolar landscape

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 180-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0299-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Nature et technologies (FRQNT)
  2. US Permafrost Association (USPA)
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Agency, NASA-ABoVE Project [14-14TE-0012, NNH16AC03I, NNX15AU14A]
  4. University of Washington
  5. US Geological Survey Land Resources Mission Area
  6. US Geological Survey Land Resources and Water Mission Areas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-latitude environments store nearly half of the planet's below-ground organic carbon (OC), mostly in perennially frozen permafrost soils. Climatic changes drive increased export of terrestrial OC into many aquatic networks, yet the role that circumpolar lakes play in mineralizing this carbon is unclear. Here we directly evaluate ecosystem-scale OC cycling for lakes of interior Alaska. This arid, low-relief lake landscape is representative of over a quarter of total northern circumpolar lake area, but is greatly under-represented in current studies. Contrary to projections based on work in other regions, the studied lakes had a negligible role in mineralizing terrestrial carbon; they received little OC from ancient permafrost soils, and had small net contribution to the watershed carbon balance. Instead, most lakes recycled large quantities of internally derived carbon fixed from atmospheric CO2, underscoring their importance as critical sites for material and energy provision to regional food webs. Our findings deviate from the prevailing paradigm that northern lakes are hotspots of terrestrial OC processing. The shallow and hydrologically disconnected nature of lakes in many arid circumpolar landscapes isolates them from terrestrial carbon processing under current climatic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available