4.8 Article

Single-neuron perturbations reveal feature-specific competition in V1

Journal

NATURE
Volume 567, Issue 7748, Pages 334-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0997-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Burroughs-Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface
  2. Searle Scholars Program
  3. New York Stem Cell Foundation
  4. NIH grants from the NIMH BRAINS program [R01 MH107620]
  5. NINDS [R01 NS089521, R01 NS108410]
  6. Armenise-Harvard Foundation Junior Faculty Grant
  7. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  8. [P30 EY012196]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The computations performed by local neural populations, such as a cortical layer, are typically inferred from anatomical connectivity and observations of neural activity. Here we describe a method-influence mapping-that uses single-neuron perturbations to directly measure how cortical neurons reshape sensory representations. In layer 2/3 of the primary visual cortex (V1), we use two-photon optogenetics to trigger action potentials in a targeted neuron and calcium imaging to measure the effect on spiking in neighbouring neurons in awake mice viewing visual stimuli. Excitatory neurons on average suppressed other neurons and had a centre-surround influence profile over anatomical space. A neuron's influence on its neighbour depended on their similarity in activity. Notably, neurons suppressed activity in similarly tuned neurons more than in dissimilarly tuned neurons. In addition, photostimulation reduced the population response, specifically to the targeted neuron's preferred stimulus, by around 2%. Therefore, V1 layer 2/3 performed feature competition, in which a like-suppresses-like motif reduces redundancy in population activity and may assist with inference of the features that underlie sensory input. We anticipate that influence mapping can be extended to investigate computations in other neural populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available