4.4 Article

NUMERICALLY MODELING STOCHASTIC LIE TRANSPORT IN FLUID DYNAMICS

Journal

MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 192-232

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/18M1167929

Keywords

geophysical fluid dynamics; stochastic Lie transport; uncertainty quantification; stochastic partial differential equation; 2D Euler equation; stochastic parameterization

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/N023781/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N023781/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a numerical investigation of stochastic transport in ideal fluids. According to Holm [Proc. A, 471 (2015)] and Cotter, Gottwald, and Holm [Proc. A, 473 (2017)], the principles of transformation theory and multitime homogenization, respectively, imply a physically meaningful, data-driven approach for decomposing the fluid transport velocity into its drift and stochastic parts for a certain class of fluid flows. In the current paper, we develop a new methodology to implement this velocity decomposition and then numerically integrate the resulting stochastic partial differential equation using a finite element discretization for incompressible two-dimensional (2D) Euler fluid flows. The new methodology tested here is found to be suitable for coarse-graining in this case. Specifically, we perform uncertainty quantification tests of the velocity decomposition of Cotter, Gottwald, and Holm, by comparing ensembles of coarse grid realizations of solutions of the resulting stochastic partial differential equation with the true solutions of the deterministic fluid partial differential equation, computed on a refined grid. The time discretization used for approximating the solution of the stochastic partial differential equation is shown to be consistent. We include comprehensive numerical tests that con firm the non-Gaussianity of the streamfunction, velocity, and vorticity fields in the case of incompressible 2D Euler fluid flows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available