4.3 Article

Effect of disease-modifying therapies on subcortical gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 312-321

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458519826364

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; quantitative MRI; disease-modifying therapies; atrophy; thalamus; biomarkers

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [P41 EB015909] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIH HHS [S10 OD021648] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS060910, R01 NS082347] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on region-specific brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) are unclear. Objective: To determine the effects of higher versus lower efficacy DMTs on rates of brain substructure atrophy in MS. Methods: A non-randomized, observational cohort of people with MS followed with annual brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated retrospectively. Whole brain, subcortical gray matter (GM), cortical GM, and cerebral white matter (WM) volume fractions were obtained. DMTs were categorized as higher (DMT-H: natalizumab and rituximab) or lower (DMT-L: interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate) efficacy. Follow-up epochs were analyzed if participants had been on a DMT for > 6 months prior to baseline and had at least one follow-up MRI while on DMTs in the same category. Results: A total of 86 DMT epochs (DMT-H: n = 32; DMT-L: n = 54) from 78 participants fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years. Annualized rates of thalamic (-0.15% vs -0.81%; p = 0.001) and putaminal (-0.27% vs -0.73%; p = 0.001) atrophy were slower during DMT-H compared to DMT-L epochs. These results remained significant in multivariate analyses including demographics, clinical characteristics, and T2 lesion volume. Conclusion: DMT-H treatment may be associated with slower rates of subcortical GM atrophy, especially of the thalamus and putamen. Thalamic and putaminal volumes are promising imaging biomarkers in MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available