4.7 Article

Redshift space distortion of 21 cm line at 1 < z < 5 with cosmological hydrodynamic simulations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 484, Issue 4, Pages 5389-5399

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz319

Keywords

hydrodynamics; galaxies: formation; intergalactic medium; cosmology: theory; radio lines: general

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16H01096, JP17H01110, JP18K03699, JP17H01111]
  2. HPCI system Research Project [hp180063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the scale dependence and redshift dependence of 21 cm line emitted from the neutral hydrogen gas at redshift 1 < z < 5 using full cosmological hydrodynamic simulations by taking the ratios between the power spectra of HI-dark matter (DM) cross-correlation and DM autocorrelation. The neutral hydrogen distribution is computed in full cosmological hydrodynamic simulations including star formation and supernova feedback under a uniform ultraviolet background radiation. We find a significant scale dependence of HI bias at z > 3 on scales of k greater than or similar to 1h Mpc(-1), but it is roughly constant at lower redshift z < 3. The redshift evolution of HI bias is relatively slow compared to that of QSOs at similar redshift range. We also measure a redshift space distortion (RSD) of HI gas to explore the properties of HI clustering. Fitting to a widely applied theoretical prediction, we find that the constant bias is consistent with that measured directly from the real space power spectra, and the velocity dispersion is marginally consistent with the linear perturbation prediction. Finally, we compare the results obtained from our simulation and the Illustris simulation, and conclude that the detailed astrophysical effects do not affect the scale dependence of HI bias very much, which implies that the cosmological analysis using 21 cm line of HI will be robust against the uncertainties arising from small-scale astrophysical processes such as star formation and supernova feedback.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available