4.5 Review

Cryo-EM structures of GPCRs coupled to Gs, Gi and Go

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 488, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.02.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Heptares Therapeutics
  2. ERC [EMPSI 339995]
  3. Medical Research Council [MRC U105197215]
  4. MRC [MC_U105197215] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advances in electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) now permit the structure determination of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins by single-particle imaging. A combination of G protein engineering and the development of antibodies that stabilise the heterotrimeric G protein facilitate the formation of stable GPCR-G protein complexes suitable for structural biology. Structures have been determined of GPCRs coupled to either heterotrimeric G proteins (G(s), G(i) or G(o)) or mini-G proteins (mini-G(s) or mini-G(o)) by single-particle cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography, respectively. This review describes the technical breakthroughs allowing their structure determination and compares the different techniques. In addition, we compare the structures of GPCRs coupled either to G(s), G(i) or G(o) and analyse the contributions of amino acid residues to the GPCR-G protein interface. There is no unique set of interactions that specifies coupling either to G(s), G(i) or G(o). Instead, there is a common core of interactions between the C-terminal alpha-helix of the G protein alpha-subunit and helices H3, H5 and H6 of the receptor. In addition, there are varying degrees of interaction between all the other GPCR helices and intracellular loops to five regions of the alpha-subunit and four regions of the beta-subunit. These data support the contention that there is not a simple linear barcode that defines the specificity of G protein coupling and thus how a G protein couples to a GPCR cannot currently be determined from simply analysing amino acid sequences. Although the overall architecture of GPCR-G protein complexes is conserved, there are significant differences in the molecular details. The number and type of molecular interactions between amino acid residues at the interfaces varies, resulting in subtly different orientation and position of the G protein with respect to the GPCR. This in turn affects the interface surface area that varies between 845 angstrom(2) and 1490 angstrom(2), which could impact upon the lifetime of signalling complexes in the cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available