4.5 Review

Global diabetic kidney disease research from 2000 to 2017: A bibliometric analysis

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014394

Keywords

bibliometric analysis; CiteSpace; diabetic kidney disease; VOSviewer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600540]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150224]
  3. Science and Technology Foundation of Xuzhou City [KC16SL119]
  4. Jiangsu Entrepreneurial Innovation Program
  5. Jiangsu Six Talent Peaks Project
  6. Jiangsu Health International (regional) exchange support program
  7. Xuzhou Entrepreneurial Innovation Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:This study aimed to analyze the scientific outputs of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) research and explore its hotspots and frontiers from 2000 to 2017, using bibliometric methods.Methods:Articles in DKD research between 2000 and 2017 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). We used the VOSviewer 1.6.8 and CiteSpace 5.2 to analyze publication years, journals, countries, institutions, authors, references, and keywords. Keywords with citation bursts were used to analyze the research hotspots and emerging trends.Results:We identified 27,577 publications in DKD research from 2000 to 2017. The annual publication number increased with time. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation published the highest number of articles. The United States was the most influential country with most publications and collaborations with other countries. Harvard University was the leading institute. Parving had the most cited publications. Keywords analysis indicated that the renin-angiotensin system inhibition used to be the most prevalent research topic, while recent research hotspots were podocyte, inflammation, and biomarker. The biomarkers for DKD screening, diagnosis, and prognosis could be a research frontier.Conclusions:The number of DKD related publications rapidly increased over the past 2 decades. Our study revealed the structure, hotspots, and evolution trends of DKD research. Further studies and more collaborations are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available