4.5 Article

Factors associated with cytomegalovirus infection in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014172

Keywords

allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation; cytomegalovirus; pediatric; reactivation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare [KMRPB3F033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While preemptive therapy with ganciclovir (GCV) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is used following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), risk factors for CMV infection in children undergoing HSCT are poorly understood. We studied CMV reactivation following allogeneic HSCT by retrospectively analyzing pediatric patients who received allogeneic HSCT and preemptive GCV therapy between 1998 and 2016. The level of viremia requiring preemptive GCV therapy was >1 CMV antigen-positive cells per 5 x 10(5) leukocytes during the antigenemia assay era and >1000copies/mL in the polymerase chain reaction era. Among 290 at-risk patients, 54 (18.6%) patients had primary CMV infection or CMV reactivation occurring at a median of 76 days (range, 7-234) following HSCT. CMV reactivation occurred in 28.2% (44/156) of CMV-seropositive transplant recipients at a median of 26 days posttransplant. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed statistically significant relationships between CMV infection and grade III-IV acute graft-vs-host disease, seronegative donor/seropositive recipient combination, and unrelated/mismatched donors. The remaining demographic factors were not predictive of CMV infection. The seronegative donor/seropositive recipient combination for HSCT was associated with an incomplete response to antiviral therapy. Human leukocyte antigen identical donors were the best choice for patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT to reduce the incidence of CMV disease and mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available