4.7 Review

Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health Monitoring: Fundamentals, approaches, and applications

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 453-482

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.06.053

Keywords

Transmissibility function; Structural health monitoring; Modal analysis; Damage detection; Model updating

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFE0113400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778203, 51408176, 51478159, 51778204]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [JZ2017HGTB0205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The difficulty of achieving controlled input has led to the development of new output-only structural health monitoring (SHM) approaches. Without measuring the input or assuming a specific input model, a transmissibility function (TF) as a mathematical representation of the output-to-output relationship has proven to be an attractive tool in SHM. The state of the art and challenges to TF analysis that cast SHM in the context of a system identification (SI) paradigm are reviewed and discussed in this study. This review starts with an overview of the fundamentals of TFs by illustrating its categories, connections with frequency response functions (FRFs), and basic properties. By categorizing TFs as local and global, this literature review limits the practice of various methodologies to the following key aspects: modal analysis, damage detection, and model updating. A brief treatment of the basic ideas is presented while a comprehensive and critical explanation of their contents is not attempted. Based on the review, existing studies are discussed, highlighting gaps requiring additional work and possible future trends for TF-based system identification. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available