4.7 Article

Reliability assessment of multi-state phased-mission systems by fusing observation data from multiple phases of operation

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 603-622

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.08.064

Keywords

Multi-state phased-mission systems; Dynamic Bayesian network; Observation data; Reliability assessment; Expectation-Maximization algorithm

Funding

  1. Science Challenge Project [TZ2018007]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771039, 61572442]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-state phased-mission systems (MS-PMSs) are multi-state systems that intend to complete multiple, consecutive, and non-overlapping phases of operation with different functional requirements. Even though many computationally efficient tools have been developed to facilitate reliability modeling of MS-PMSs in the past few decades, reliability assessment of an MS-PMS by observation data is still a difficulty because of the state and phase dependencies. This paper devotes to addressing this challenge by putting forth a new method that can assess reliability of an MS-PMS by fusing observation data collected from multiple phases of operation. A dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) model is constructed to characterize the state dependence between an MS-PMS and its units as well as the phase dependence of each unit across consecutive phases. By putting observation data into the DBN model, the joint probability distributions of the nodes of the MS-PMS at any time slice can be updated, and with which the unknown parameters associated with the state transitions of all the units can be furtherly estimated by a tailored Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. The reliability function of the MS-PMS can be, then, assessed by these estimates of all the units. Two illustrative examples, including a numerical case and a data collection robot are exemplified to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available