4.7 Article

Analysis of surface quality during fabrication of automotive retroreflectors

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 649-657

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.011

Keywords

Automotive lighting; Retroreflective structures; Pin-bundling-electroforming; Ultraprecise single point inverted cutting; Surface quality analysis

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to their inherent functionality, retroreflective structures play a vital role in styling and safety that are typically associated with automotive lighting components. The optical performance of the automotive retroreflectors is strongly dependent on the quality of the functional facets that are involved in redirecting the incoming light. To date, virtually all automotive retroreflectors are fabricated through a conventional process commonly termed as pin-bundling-electroforming (PBE) or simply pin-bundling whose surface quality outcome is largely unknown despite the relatively venerable age of this manufacturing technology. To address this, the main goal of the present study was to perform a quantitative assessment of the quality characteristics associated with the three main phases of the PBE to be then contrasted with those of a newer and more versatile retroreflector fabrication technique called ultraprecise single point inverted cutting (USPIC). The results obtained showed that while the average areal roughness of PBE-generated inverted corner cube optical microstructures remains less than half than that of the USPIC-fabricated right triangular prism retroreflectors (9.2-9.5 nm vs 19.7 nm), their average waviness values remain comparable (29.9 nm vs. 32.9 nm). It is expected that the surface assessments presented in the scope of the present study will constitute a valuable baseline for future research efforts aiming to develop retroreflector-fabrication alternatives that are superior to PBE. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available