4.7 Review

Multimodal Approaches to Define Network Oscillations in Depression

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 77, Issue 12, Pages 1061-1070

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.01.002

Keywords

Depression; Electrophysiology; Neurocircuitry; Neuroimaging; Neuromodulation; Treatment-resistant

Funding

  1. Dana Foundation
  2. Woodruff Fund
  3. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  4. Hope for Depression Research Foundation
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [3R01NS079268-02S1]
  6. Food and Drug Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The renaissance in the use of encephalography-based research methods to probe the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders is well afoot and continues to advance. Building on the platform of neuroimaging evidence on brain circuit models, magnetoencephalography, scalp electroencephalography, and even invasive electroencephalography are now being used to characterize brain network dysfunctions that underlie major depressive disorder using brain oscillation measurements and associated treatment responses. Such multiple encephalography modalities provide avenues to study pathologic network dynamics with high temporal resolution and over long time courses, opportunities to complement neuroimaging methods and findings, and new approaches to identify quantitative biomarkers that indicate critical targets for brain therapy. Such goals have been facilitated by the ongoing testing of novel invasive neuromodulation therapies, notably, deep brain stimulation, where clinically relevant treatment effects can be monitored at multiple brain sites in a time-locked causal manner. We review key brain rhythms identified in major depressive disorder as foundation for development of putative biomarkers for objectively evaluating neuromodulation success and for guiding deep brain stimulation or other target-based neuromodulation strategies for treatment-resistant depression patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available