4.6 Article

Mixed matrix polymeric and carbon hollow fiber membranes with magnetic iron-based nanoparticles and their application in gas mixture separation

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages 220-229

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.10.047

Keywords

Magnetic; Nanoparticles; Hollow fibers; gamma-Fe2O3; Membranes; Composites; Separation

Funding

  1. Gas Research Center of the Petroleum Institute, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi [GRC16002]
  2. project MIS under the Action for the Strategic Development on the Research and Technological Sector - Operational Programme Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation (NSRF 2014-2020) [5002567]
  3. European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The addition of magnetic nanoparticle fillers to polymers forming mixed matrix membranes can affect gas mixture separation owing to variation of magnetic susceptibility of different gas molecules and variable interaction with the dispersed magnetic fillers that can alter separation selectivity. Herein, polymeric hollow fibers were produced from a commercial co-polyimide precursor via phase inversion, whereas carbon hollow fibers were also prepared by carbonization of the polymeric ones. Gas permeation performance of the above membranes was evaluated and compared to performance after doping the membranes with Fe-based magnetic nanoparticles introduced into the membranes as fillers and acting as internal nano-magnets. The magnetic properties of the resulting materials were evaluated by Mossbauer spectroscopy and Squid magnetization measurements. Permeation experiments, using a series of gas molecules, namely CO2, O-2, N-2 and CH4, were also conducted. The results indicated that the introduced magnetic nanoparticles modified the gas permeance/separation properties of both the polymeric and carbon composite membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available