Journal
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 612, Issue -, Pages 209-215Publisher
INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps12867
Keywords
Seaweed; Terminology; Kelp; Macroalgae; Communication
Categories
Funding
- Australian Research Council [DP160100114, DP190100058, 190100692]
- Norwegian Blue Forest Network
- Institute for Marine Research
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Seascapes dominated by large, structurally complex seaweeds are ubiquitous. These critical ecosystems are under increasing pressure from human activities, and conceiving successful management strategies to ensure their persistence and/or recovery is of paramount importance. Currently, ecosystems dominated by large seaweeds are referred to as either 'forests' or 'beds'. We demonstrate how this dual terminology is confusing, is used inconsistently, and reduces the efficiency of communication about the importance and perils of seaweed habitats. As a consequence, it undermines work to alleviate and mitigate their loss and impedes research on unifying principles in ecology. We conclude that there are clear benefits of simply using the more intuitive term 'forest' to describe all seascapes dominated by habitat-forming seaweeds. This is particularly true as researchers scramble to reconcile ecological functions and patterns of change across disparate regions and species to match the increasingly global scale of environmental forcing on these critical ecosystems.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available