4.5 Article

Fast quantitative 3D ultrashort echo time MRI of cortical bone using extended cones sampling

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 225-236

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27715

Keywords

cortical bone; quantitative; sampling window; UTE imaging

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01 AR062581-01A1, 1R01 NS092650, 1R01 AR068987-01, T32 EB005970]
  2. Veterans Affairs [I01CX001388, I01RX002604]
  3. Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center [SHDC22015026, 16CR4029A]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [16410722200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To investigate the effect of stretching sampling window on quantitative 3D ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging of cortical bone at 3 T. Methods: Ten bovine cortical bone and 17 human tibial midshaft samples were imaged with a 3T clinical MRI scanner using an 8-channel knee coil. Quantitative 3D UTE imaging biomarkers, including T-1 , T-2(*) , magnetization transfer ratio and magnetization transfer modeling, were performed using radial or spiral Cones sampling trajectories with various durations. Errors in UTE-MRI biomarkers as a function of sampling time were evaluated using radial sampling as a reference standard. Results: For both bovine and human cortical bone samples, no significant differences were observed for all UTE biomarkers (single-component T-2(*) , bicomponent T-2(*) and relative fractions, T-1 , magnetization transfer ratio, and magnetization transfer modeling of macromolecular fraction) for spiral sampling windows of 992 mu s to 1600 mu s compared with a radial sampling window of 688 mu s. Conclusion: The total scan time can be reduced by 76% with quantification errors less than 5%. Quantitative UTE-MRI techniques can be greatly accelerated using longer sampling windows without significant quantification errors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available