4.6 Article

Mantle driven cretaceous flare-ups in Cordilleran arcs

Journal

LITHOS
Volume 326, Issue -, Pages 19-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.12.007

Keywords

Mantle; Crust; Flare-up; Arcs; Isotopes; Assimilation

Funding

  1. Loma Linda University [GRI2014-BC01, GRI2015-AM10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Continental arcs display episodic magmatism characterized by flare-ups and lulls. Models published to explain these patterns invoke (1) upper plate crustal processes driven by internal feedback; (2) episodic mantle melting processes, or (3) external lower plate tectonic events. This study addresses the role of mantle magmas during flare-ups in Mesozoic Cretaceous continental arcs using geochronological and geochemical data for three Cretaceous arc segments: the western Peninsular Ranges Batholith (wPRB), the Peruvian Coastal Batholith (PCB), and the Chilean Coastal Batholith (CCB). In all three arc segments, bedrock zircon age patterns defining a flare-up from similar to 125 to 90 Ma characterized by gabbro to granite units with Sri < 0.705, epsilon Nd from 0 to +7.5, Pb-208/Pb-204 from 38.2 to 38.7, and Pb-206/Pb-204 from 18.3 to 18.7. These values project well towards a depleted mantle source. Areal measurements show that gabbro forms -18% (wPRB), similar to 24% (PCB), and similar to 10% (CCB) of exposed plutonic material. AFC modeling indicates that these magmas have experienced fractional crystallization with only minor crustal assimilation (<20-30%), implying that the great majority of these magmas are mantle-derived. Thus the cause of these flare-ups must be episodic mantle processes: crustal melting was not required for triggering the flare-up, and only played a secondary role in modifying melt compositions. It remains unclear if the episodic mantle processes reflect internal feedback(s) or external tectonically driven processes. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available