4.7 Review

Chemometric applications to assess quality and critical parameters of virgin and extra-virgin olive oil. A review

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 913, Issue -, Pages 1-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.01.025

Keywords

Olive oil; Chemometrics; Analytical techniques; Quality control; Authentication

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [JCI-2012-12566]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET) [PIP 0471]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PIP 0471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Today virgin and extra-virgin olive oil (VOO and EVOO) are food with a large number of analytical tests planned to ensure its quality and genuineness. Almost all official methods demand high use of reagents and manpower. Because of that, analytical development in this area is continuously evolving. Therefore, this review focuses on analytical methods for EVOO/VOO which use fast and smart approaches based on chemometric techniques in order to reduce time of analysis, reagent consumption, high cost equipment and manpower. Experimental approaches of chemometrics coupled with fast analytical techniques such as UV-Vis spectroscopy, fluorescence, vibrational spectroscopies (NIR, MIR and Raman fluorescence), NMR spectroscopy, and other more complex techniques like chromatography, calorimetry and electrochemical techniques applied to EVOO/VOO production and analysis have been discussed throughout this work. The advantages and drawbacks of this association have also been highlighted. Chemometrics has been evidenced as a powerful tool for the oil industry. In fact, it has been shown how chemometrics can be implemented all along the different steps of EVOO/VOO production: raw material input control, monitoring during process and quality control of final product. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available