4.7 Review

Big science and big data in nephrology

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 1326-1337

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.11.048

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; gene expression; proteomic analysis

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [KR-4073/3-1, SCHN1188/5-1, SFB/TRR57, SFB/TRR219, RI-2811/1-1, RI-2811/2-1]
  2. European Research Council [ERC-StG 677448]
  3. State of Northrhine Westfalia
  4. Joint Research Center for Computational Biomedicine (Bayer AG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There have been tremendous advances during the last decade in methods for large-scale, high-throughput data generation and in novel computational approaches to analyze these datasets. These advances have had a profound impact on biomedical research and clinical medicine. The field of genomics is rapidly developing toward single-cell analysis, and major advances in proteomics and metabolomics have been made in recent years. The developments on wearables and electronic health records are poised to change clinical trial design. This rise of 'big data' holds the promise to transform not only research progress, but also clinical decision making towards precision medicine. To have a true impact, it requires integrative and multi-disciplinary approaches that blend experimental, clinical and computational expertise across multiple institutions. Cancer research has been at the forefront of the progress in such large-scale initiatives, so-called 'big science,' with an emphasis on precision medicine, and various other areas are quickly catching up. Nephrology is arguably lagging behind, and hence these are exciting times to start (or redirect) a research career to leverage these developments in nephrology. In this review, we summarize advances in big data generation, computational analysis, and big science initiatives, with a special focus on applications to nephrology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available