4.1 Article

Survey of US wastewater for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 219-226

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wh.2019.165

Keywords

carbapenem-resistant E. coli; carbapenemases; ESBL; wastewater

Funding

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through its Office of Research and Development
  2. Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A survey for antibiotic-resistant (AR) Escherichia coli in wastewater was undertaken by collecting samples from primary clarifiers and secondary effluents from seven geographically dispersed US wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Samples were collected at each WWTP in cool and summer months and cultured using selective media. The resulting isolates were characterized for resistance to imipenem, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime, presence of carbapenemase and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes, and phylogroups and sequence types (STs). In total, 322 AR E. coli isolates were identified, of which 65 were imipenem-resistant. Of the 65 carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREC) isolates, 62% were positive for more than one and 31% were positive for two or more of carbapenemase and ESBL genes targeted. The most commonly detected carbapenemase gene was bla(VIM) (n = 36), followed by bla(KPC) (n = 2). A widespread dispersal of carbapenem-resistant STs and other clinically significant AR STs observed in the present study suggested the plausible release of these strains into the environment. The occurrence of CREC in wastewater is a potential concern because this matrix may serve as a reservoir for gene exchange and thereby increase the risk of AR bacteria (including CR) being disseminated into the environment and thence back to humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available