4.7 Article

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide During Treatment With Sacubitril/Valsartan The PARADIGM-HF Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 11, Pages 1264-1272

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.018

Keywords

biomarker; heart failure; natriuretic peptides; prognostication; risk stratification; treatment

Funding

  1. Novartis AG
  2. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  3. Akershus University Hospital, Norway
  4. Norwegian Medical Association
  5. Unger Vetlesen Medical Fund
  6. Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Institutes of Health/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Award) [UL 1TR002541]
  7. Amgen
  8. Servier
  9. Alnylam
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Bellerophon
  12. Bayer
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Celladon
  15. Cytokinetics
  16. Eidos
  17. Gilead
  18. GlaxoSmithKline
  19. Ionis
  20. Lone Star Heart
  21. Mesoblast
  22. MyoKardia
  23. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  24. Sanofi Pasteur
  25. Theracos
  26. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Natriuretic peptides are substrates of neprilysin; hence, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations rise with neprilysin inhibition. Thus, the clinical validity of measuring BNP in sacubitril/valsartan-treated patients has been questioned, and use of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) has been preferred and recommended. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic performance of BNP measurements before and during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS BNP and NT-proBNP were measured before and after 4 to 6 weeks, 8 to 10 weeks, and 9 months of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. We assessed the association of levels of these natriuretic peptides with the subsequent risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF. RESULTS Median BNP concentration (before treatment: 202 ng/l [Q1 to Q3: 126 to 335 ng/l]) increased to 235 ng/l (Q1 to Q3: 128 to 422 ng/l) after 8 to 10 weeks of treatment. BNP concentrations doubled in 141 (18%) patients and tripled in 49 (6%) patients during the first 8 to 10 weeks of sacubitril/valsartan. In contrast, such striking increases in NT-proBNP following the use of the neprilysin inhibitor were extremely rare. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan caused a rightward shift in the distribution of BNP when compared with NT-proBNP, but both peptides retained their prognostic accuracy (C-statistics of 63% to 67% for BNP and C-statistics of 64% to 70% for NT-proBNP) with no difference between the 2 biomarkers. Increases in both BNP and NT-proBNP during 8 to 10 weeks of sacubitril/valsartan were associated with worse outcomes (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Circulating levels of BNP may increase meaningfully early after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. In comparison, NT-proBNP is not a substrate of neprilysin inhibition, and thus may lead to less clinical confusion when measured within 8 to 10 weeks of drug initiation. However, during treatment, either biomarker predicts the risk of major adverse outcomes in patients treated with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors. (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF]; NCT01035255) (c) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available