4.8 Article

A Uranium Tri-Rhenium Triple Inverse Sandwich Compound

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 141, Issue 13, Pages 5144-5148

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b01331

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Heavy Element Chemistry Program of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) at LBNL [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE 1106400]
  3. U.S. DOE Integrated University Program
  4. National Institutes of Health [1R35GM126961-01]
  5. Chinese Academy of Science
  6. Humboldt Foundation
  7. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salt metathesis between the anionic rhenium(I) compound, Na[Re(eta(5)-Cp)(BDI)] (BDI = N,N'-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-3,5-dimethyl-beta-diketiminate), and the uranium(III) salt, UI3 (1,4-dioxane)(1.5), generated the triple inverse sandwich complex, U[(mu-eta(5):eta(5)-Cp)Re(BDI)(3), which was isolated and structurally characterized as the Lewis base adducts, (L)U[(mu-eta(5):eta(5)-Cp)Re(BDI)](3) (1.L, L = THF, 1,4-dioxane, DMAP). The assignment as one uranium(III) and three rhenium(I) centers was supported by X-ray crystallography, NMR and EPR spectroscopies, and computational studies. An unusual shortening of the rhenium-Cp bond distances in 1.L relative to Na[Re(eta(5)-Cp)(BDI)] was observed in the solid-state and reproduced in calculated structures of 1-THF and the anionic fragment, [Re(eta(5)-Cp)(BDI)](-). Calculations suggest that the electropositive uranium center pulls electron density away from the electron-rich rhenium centers, reducing electron-electron repulsions in the rhenium-Cp moieties and thereby strengthening those interactions, while also making uranium-Cp bonding more favorable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available