4.5 Article

Variation in Nonsurgical Treatment Recommendations for Common Upper Extremity Conditions

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00882

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In orthopaedic surgery, there is known surgeon-to-surgeon variation in recommendations for surgery. Variation in recommendations for nonsurgical treatment of common upper extremity conditions for which surgery is discretionary remains unclear. Methods: One hundred eighty-three surgeons were included after completing six questions on six scenarios of upper extremity conditions regarding nonsurgical treatment recommendations. For one scenario, we measured the influence of reading a summary of preferred practice before making recommendations. Results: Variation in nonsurgical treatment recommendations was observed between surgeons and between upper extremity conditions. Surgeons that reviewed a decision support paragraph were more likely to opine that surgery would eventually be beneficial. Discussion: The notable variation in nonsurgical treatment recommendations indicates a substantial influence of surgeon bias in decision-making. To help ensure that decisions are consistent, surgeons may benefit from decision support and guidelines to help limit practice variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available