4.3 Article

On the automatic selection of the tuning parameter appearing in certain families of goodness-of-fit tests

Journal

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION
Volume 89, Issue 10, Pages 1780-1797

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2019.1598409

Keywords

Goodness-of-fit tests; data-based tuning parameter selection; calibration; normality tests; empirical characteristic function; exponentiality tests; empirical Laplace transform

Funding

  1. Centre for Mathematics of the University of Coimbra - Portuguese Government through FCT/MEC [UID/MAT/00324/2013]
  2. European Regional Development Fund through the Partnership Agreement PT2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The situation, common in the current literature, is that of a whole family of location-scale/scale invariant test statistics, indexed by a parameter , is available to test the goodness of fit of F, the underlying distribution function of a set of independent real-valued random variables, to a location-scale/scale family of distribution functions. The power properties of the tests associated with the different statistics usually depend on the parameter , called the tuning parameter, which is the reason that its choice is crucial to obtain a performing test procedure. In this paper, we address the automatic selection of the tuning parameter when is finite, as well as the calibration of the associated goodness-of-fit test procedure. Examples of existing and new tuning parameter selectors are discussed, and the methodology presented of combining different test statistics into a single test procedure is applied to well known families of test statistics for normality and exponentiality. A simulation study is carried out to access the power of the different tests under consideration, and to compare them with the fixed tuning parameter procedure, usually recommended in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available