4.3 Article

Development and validation of a new elbow-specific scoring system for patients with elbow stiffness: the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 296-303

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.007

Keywords

Clinical scoring system; elbow stiffness; validation; reliability; validity; responsiveness

Funding

  1. Project of Key Discipline Group of Shanghai Pudong New Area Health and Family Planning Commission [PWZxq2017-03]
  2. Three-year Action Plan of Clinical Skills and Innovation of Shanghai Hospital Development Center [16CR3029A]
  3. Project of Medical Guidance of Foundation of Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [17411966900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Clinical scoring systems are increasingly important and popular for the evaluation of orthopedic patients. Elbow stiffness commonly causes functional impairment and upper-limb disability. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new elbow-specific assessment score to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness. Methods: The new system, the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS), was developed in 3 portions: elbow motion capacities, elbow-related symptoms, and patient satisfaction level. A total of 73 patients with elbow stiffness were prospectively included. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach a values were calculated for test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the SHEDS with previously validated scoring systems. Effect sizes (ES) and standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for responsiveness. Results: Positive reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 and adequate homogeneity with a Cronbach a value of 0.74 were found for the SHEDS. Good to excellent validity using Spearman correlation coefficients (SCCs) were determined for the total (0.51-0.82), motion (0.65-0.89), and symptom (0.35-0.53) scores. Responsiveness was large for the total ES, 3.48; SRM, 2.96), motion (ES, 2.54; SRM, 2.08), and symptom (ES, 1.26; SRM, 1.14) scores. There were no ceiling or floor effects. Significant positive correlations were found between patient satisfaction levels and the final scores (SCC, 0.62), as well as the score changes of the SHEDS (SCC, 0.42). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the newly developed SHEDS is an excellent, comprehensive, valid scoring system to evaluate joint function in patients with elbow stiffness. (C) 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available