4.5 Article

Magnetic solid-phase extraction of benzoylurea insecticides in tea samples with Fe3O4-hyperbranched polyester magnetic composite as sorbent

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 1610-1619

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201801159

Keywords

benzoylurea insecticides; high-performance liquid chromatography; hyperbranched polyester; magnetic solid-phase extraction; tea samples

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1604402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21677174, 21507159]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a method for the analysis of benzoylurea insecticides, including hexaflumuron, flufenoxuron, lufenuron and chlorfluazuron, in tea samples by highperformance liquid chromatography with Fe3O4-hyperbranched polyester nanocomposite as the adsorbent for magnetic solid-phase extraction was developed. The magnetic nanocomposite was prepared and characterized by infrared spectroscopy, vibrating sample magnetometry, and scanning electron microscopy. The as-prepared nanocomposite was used as a sorbent for the extraction and preconcentration of pesticide residues in tea samples. The extraction and desorption conditions, including mass ratios of raw materials, amount of sorbent, pH value, extraction time, and desorption time, were investigated. Under the final conditions chosen for the analysis, good linearity was obtained for all the tested compounds, with R-2 values of at least 0.9979. The limits of detection were determined in the range of 0.15-0.3 mu g/L. The recovery obtained from the analysis of tea samples with various spiked concentrations was between 90.7 and 98.4%, with relative standard deviations ( n = 4) lower than 4.1%. Furthermore, the present approach was successfully applied to the quantitative determination of residues of benzoylurea insecticides in real samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available