4.5 Article

High-resolution analysis of the 12.6μm spectral region of the nitryl chloride ClNO2 molecule

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.11.020

Keywords

Nitryl chloride; ClNO2; High-resolution fourier transform spectroscopy; Coriolis and Fermi resonances; Line positions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 12.6 mu m region of nitryl chloride (ClNO2) has been recorded at high resolution (0.00102 cm(-1)) using a Fourier transform spectrometer and the SOLEIL synchrotron light source. ClNO2 was found during our studies of chlorine nitrate and, after fractional distillations it was introduced into a multipass White cell made of inert materials, with an optical path length of 5.4m. 320 scans were recorded for the range 600-980 cm(-1) at a total pressure of 0.23 hPa and a temperature of 250 K. A thorough analysis of the nu(2), 2 nu(6) and 2 nu(3) bands of (ClNO2)-Cl-35 and of the nu(2) band of (ClNO2)-Cl-37 falling in this region has been carried out using a Hamiltonian model which takes explicitly into account the numerous resonances affecting the ro-vibrational energy levels; especially the C-type Coriolis resonance between the nu(2) and the nu(3)+nu(6) modes. These two modes are only separated by less than 20 cm(-1) and are thoroughly mixed. From the fittings, the following band centers were derived: nu(0)(nu(2))=792.761264(60) cm(-1), nu(0)(nu(3)+nu(6))=775.8923(20) cm(-1), nu(0)(2 nu(3))=734.183576(20) cm(-1) and nu(0)(2 nu(6))=819.836727(90) cm(-1) for (ClNO2)-Cl-35 and nu(0)(nu(2))=792.258284(30) cm(-1) and nu(0)(nu(3)+nu(6))=774.6826(30) cm(-1) for (ClNO2)-Cl-37 where the uncertainties are one standard deviation. Due to their sharp Q branches falling into an atmospheric window, the detection of the nu(2) bands might be an advantageous route for future attempts to quantify atmospheric ClNO2, using infrared techniques. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available